Back to all countries

Australia

TL2 regional drilldown

Sub-national disposable income across the country's TL2 (Territorial Level 2) regions. Bars are scaled relative to the country mean — a value of 1.20× means that region's residents have 20% more disposable income than the national average. The dashed vertical line marks the mean.

TL2 regions

16

Coefficient of variation

0.251

Richest / poorest ratio

2.03×

Latest year

2019

Regional income relative to country mean

Each bar is one TL2 region. Darker color = above mean; lighter = below. Bars sorted by absolute value, descending.

Australian Capita…Australian Capita…Northern TerritoryNorthern TerritoryWestern AustraliaNew South WalesWestern AustraliaNew South WalesSouth AustraliaSouth AustraliaQueenslandQueenslandTasmaniaVictoriaTasmaniaVictoria1.60×1.55×1.18×1.14×0.98×0.97×0.95×0.94×0.90×0.87×0.86×0.84×0.82×0.81×0.80×0.79×

All regions

#RegionUSD PPP / capitaShare of mean
1Australian Capital TerritoryAU853,8021.60×
2Australian Capital TerritoryAU852,1681.55×
3Northern TerritoryAU739,7511.18×
4Northern TerritoryAU738,5441.14×
5Western AustraliaAU533,0920.98×
6New South WalesAU132,6700.97×
7Western AustraliaAU532,0870.95×
8New South WalesAU131,6780.94×
9South AustraliaAU430,2350.90×
10South AustraliaAU429,3170.87×
11QueenslandAU329,0820.86×
12QueenslandAU328,1980.84×
13TasmaniaAU627,7660.82×
14VictoriaAU227,2720.81×
15TasmaniaAU626,9230.80×
16VictoriaAU226,4440.79×

Source: OECD CFE.EDS, DSD_REG_ECO@DF_INC. Disposable income (B6N), per capita, USD PPP. Region codes follow OECD TL2 classification — the standard sub-national breakdown for cross-country comparison (e.g. NL32 = North Holland, USCA = California). Latest available year per country, which may differ between countries.